Dear We The People;
Q: What Do
These Three People Have In Common?
(place photos of Banister*, Jackson and Turner here)
A: All Are Ex-IRS Agents Who Have Resigned Their Positions
And Joined A Growing Number Of Former
And Present IRS Officers, Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, And Retired
Judges Who Believe And Assert That:
1. There is NO LAW that requires most Americans to file a tax return, pay
the federal income tax nor have the tax withheld from their earnings.
2. In 1913, the 16th Amendment (the "income
tax" Amendment) was fraudulently
and illegally
declared to be ratified by a lame-duck Secretary of State
just days
before leaving office.
3. Also in 1913, Congress created the Federal Reserve
System, a banking cartel
organized by
the largest private banks in the country. By 1933, the FRS had
been granted
the power to:
·
Fabricate money out of thin air.
·
Charge interest to the Government for
the use of the Fed's currency.
·
Receive taxes to pay the interest on
the debt created therefrom, to be paid
with the
American People's gold and silver.
This is all in clear violation
of the U.S. Constitution.
NOTE: Most
people do not know that the "Fed" is a privately owned
corporation
functioning as a central bank. Nor do they know that the monetary
policies of
the FRS (i.e., its foreign exchange and domestic open market
operations)
have never been fully audited.
4. Those who file a Form 1040 "voluntarily"
waive their 5th Amendment (Miranda)
right not to
bear witness against themselves.
5. The IRS routinely violates citizens' 4th Amendment
rights against illegal search
and seizure
without a warrant issued by a court upon probable cause and
supported by
oath and affirmation. IRS levies and seizures are unenforceable
because the
IRS is UNABLE AND UNWILLING to swear under oath that a law
has been
broken or that there is probable cause of a violation.
6. The IRS, as standard operating procedure, routinely
violates citizens' due
process
rights in its administrative procedures and operates far outside the
law. The
courts cannot be relied upon to strike down such actions.
We will soon begin a series of full-page messages in the Friday edition
of USA Today and the weekly edition of the Washington Times, which is published
each Monday.
Our effort is called "Project Toto." Just as
the little dog in the Wizard of Oz pulls the curtain back and exposes the truth
about the Wizard, our series is intended to inform and educate many millions of
citizens about the documentary evidence that reveals the facts about the
limited nature of the federal income tax.
The factual evidence is taken from federal income tax laws, federal
regulations, the IRS employees' manual, various government documents, letters,
and publications and U.S. court decisions.
Citizens will be able to see for themselves how the
operations of the IRS, the federal income tax system, and the Federal Reserve
dramatically exceed what is authorized by the Constitution, laws, and
regulations. People will be able to
understand how and why the system has been deliberately designed to deceive,
confuse, and intimidate.
Many citizens will find this material disturbing and
difficult to believe - at first - because it indicates the income tax system is
founded upon fraud and operates as a giant hoax. We will come to learn how
inflation was made possible and our currency debased when the government
legalized the Federal Reserve to issue our money out of thin air, without the
backing of precious metals (as dictated specifically by the Constitution).
We invite you to examine the evidence critically, seek
out the references, and become students of this subject along with us. Soon you will begin to demand answers to the
questions that have been raised -- answers that have not been forthcoming from
our government or our free press.
Ask your lawyer to disprove our assertions.
Ask your lawyer why he was never taught these things in
law school.
Ask your CPA to show you exactly how you are liable to
pay the income tax.
Ask your tax preparer if they have ever looked at these
regulations.
Ask your employer how it can take your wages without a
Court order.
Ask your school why they allow the IRS to teach our
children to fill out tax forms.
Ask your newspapers why they have never investigated the
specifics of these claims as our fellow
citizens have been prosecuted in our courts.
Ask the IRS to SHOW YOU WHAT LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FILE A
FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN.
And finally, ask your spouse -- your friends -- and your
neighbors -- if
this is all TRUE, under what authority has the IRS used
the power it has wielded against the American people, if that authority was not
given to it by our Constitution, our Congress and the Secretary of the Treasury?
If we are to be a nation of laws, justice, and due
process, we cannot have a tax system or government that operates in violation
of its own laws and the People's Constitution. We cannot allow the IRS to seize
the property of its citizens, ruin them financially, harm their families, and
induce fear in their hearts - while refusing to show proof of authority. This is exactly the kind of behavior the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights were intended to prevent.
We must demand the truth about the Federal Reserve and
the tax laws, and that the IRS heed obedience to the tax code, and the
well-established principles of due process. We must then insist that the courts
address the issues based on the merits and the legal evidence. All relevant
evidence that a defendant wishes to present or that a jury wants to see
(including the law itself) should be allowed and produced for inspection and
examination.
We will continue to invite expert representatives of our
government to participate in conferences, debates, and symposiums to answer the
questions and allegations raised by tax researchers across this land who have
concluded that the IRS routinely operates beyond the authority of the law. CONTINUAL
EVASION OF THE ALLEGATIONS MUST BE SEEN AS AN ADMISSION THAT THE
ALLEGATIONS ARE CORRECT.
Did you know that a bill has been introduced in the
House of Representatives to abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System and each Federal Reserve Bank? Did you know that on April 13,
2000, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to abolish the
individual income tax?
In our upcoming series, we will present more details of
researchers' findings and allegations, such as those briefly outlined
below. More tax code references and
legal citations will be provided in those messages. We want the government to answer the questions raised by these
allegations, clearly and unambiguously.
STATUTORY
AUTHORITY, JURISDICTION, AND LIABILITY
The Code sections
that the IRS cites as their authority to tax virtually everyone's income
(Sections 1, 6001, 6011, and 6012) do not say that everyone is liable
for the income tax - only that
one must file a return IF one is liable.
For Americans,
including the self-employed, the only tax form authorized under the sections
referred to above is Form 2555, titled "Foreign Earned Income," not
Form 1040, as Americans have been led to believe.
The only Code
sections that establish liability for the income tax or the withholding of it
refer to nonresident aliens, foreign corporations, and their withholding
agents, who are required to file a 1040 return (26 USC sections 7701, 1441,
1442, 1443, and 1461).
Internal revenue
employees were instructed long ago by the Treasury Secretary that Form 1040 was
for the above purpose; it was never intended by law to be used for U.S.
citizens who earn their income within the 50 states and whose income is not by
law subject to the income tax.
Wages of most citizens have never been intended by law to be subject to
the income tax. Earlier editions of the Code made it much clearer that wages
and salaries were not gross income.
Successive editions of the Code, while saying the application of the law
has not changed, have been gradually and cleverly modified by the legislative
attorneys who codify the law, e.g., by reorganizing sections so that their
numbers change, then deleting footnotes and references to make it difficult to
trace the law back to corresponding sections in earlier versions.
Code section
6020(b), that the IRS invokes when it assesses income tax on individuals who
have not filed a Form 1040, does not authorize them to assess income tax on
individuals.
Wages of most
Americans are not, by law, subject to the income tax. Although wages are
income, they do not meet the formal legal definition for inclusion as
"Gross Income" from which the tax is calculated.
Delegation Orders
from the IRS Commissioner to IRS employees, which authorize them to prepare and sign tax returns for persons who
are required to file, but did not, do not include Forms 1040 or 2555 on
the list of authorized returns.
The Internal
Revenue Manual says that IRS criminal investigators are authorized to enforce
criminal statutes applicable to taxes for U.S. citizens residing in foreign
countries and non-resident aliens subject to federal income tax filing
requirements. There is no mention of
citizens living and earning their money in the U.S. Why not?
` The Manual says the Criminal
Investigation Division is under the direction of the international branch
of the IRS, headed by the Assistant Commissioner International. Again, there is no discernible authority to
investigate Americans who live and earn their money in the 50 states. Again, why not?
The regulations implementing
the statutes governing tax liens and levies are under the jurisdiction of the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, not the Internal Revenue Service.
IRS revenue
officers are authorized by law to conduct only civil enforcement under Subtitle
E (pertaining to alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes), not under Subtitle A
(income taxes). No one can show
anywhere in the Code, nor has it ever been published in the Federal Register,
where revenue officers are authorized to investigate alleged income tax
liabilities of citizens who live and earn money within the 50 states. Why not?
Letters sent by revenue officers concerning 1040 returns are without
authority of the law.
There is no law
that Americans must have a social security number. An employer who is participating in the social security program
is required to give a W-4 to each worker, but is not required to get it back,
and the worker is not required to fill it out and give it back, unless the
worker wants to participate in social security. Absent a W-4, an employer is not authorized by law to take money
out of a worker's pay for employment taxes.
An increasing
number of employers have, in accordance with the law, stopped withholding
income and employment taxes from the money they pay their workers.
According to
Sections 1.1441-5 of the Code of Federal Regulations and IRS instructions
(Publication #515), if a worker submits, in duplicate, a statement of U.S.
citizenship (a simple letter will do) the employer/withholding agent is
relieved of duty to withhold taxes from money paid to that worker. The withholding agent, no matter where
located, then is to send one copy of the statement to the IRS Philadelphia
Service Center (not to their own regional center); Philadelphia is the
International Service Center, and withholding only applies to aliens or foreign
income.
IRS officials
typically cannot swear that income tax is due in order to get a court warrant,
as per the 4th amendment of the Constitution.
As an indication of how much confusion there is about
legal aspects of the income tax, the highest courts in the land cannot make up
their collective mind on a point as basic as whether it is a direct tax or an
indirect tax (those being the two classes of taxes established by the
Constitution). The U.S. Supreme Court
ruled early on that the income tax was in the nature of an excise tax, which
would make it indirect. However, six of
the 11 federal circuit appeals courts have ruled it to be a direct tax, in open
defiance or rebellion against the Supreme Court, and those rulings have never
been overturned.
We will present messages dealing with a number of other
topics related to the income tax. For
example:
We'll tell about the fraudulent ratification of the 16th
amendment in 1913 at the 11th hour of the Taft administration. We'll review some of the background and
characters involved, some of the errors that were made, and how dogged research by one courageous American revealed
what really happened.
We'll look at the murky, secret origins of the Federal
Reserve System and its establishment as a banking cartel in 1913 after the
income tax amendment was certified.
We'll describe how it was billed as a banking reform measure, but was
written by the very interests it was supposedly intended to reform. We'll discuss its ostensible objectives for
public consumption, its actual true objectives, and how well each set of
objectives has been achieved. We'll
review some reasons why a growing number of people feel the Fed should be
abolished. We'll look at how the
Framers envisioned our monetary system, how that has been changed into a system
of infinite debt, and how the dollar has been debased by the creation of fiat
money.
We'll dust off the concept of juries as a powerful tool
of We The People to control abuses by
government against its citizens. We'll
tell you what many judges and prosecutors do not want citizens to know about
their duty and rights as members of a jury.
We'll tell you about jury nullification and how one jury acquitted a
defendant based on lack of statutory evidence that there was any law requiring
him to file an income tax return when neither the judge nor the prosecutor
could produce it.
[BOX]----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Joe Banister was an IRS Criminal Investigation
Division (IRS-CID) Special Agent, a gun-carrying law enforcement officer, fraud
investigator, and CPA, who was "encouraged" to resign two years ago
after confronting his superiors with the results of his own two-year
investigation into claims made by tax researchers about the above allegations.
Mr. Banister concluded that the tax researchers were CORRECT, and that the IRS
has, in fact, been deceiving the American public and exceeding its
constitutional and statutory authority.
You can read his 95-page report at www.freedomabovefortune.com.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
This message is presented solely for educational and
informational purposes. It is not
intended and should not be construed as legal advice. We The People Foundation does not advocate disobedience to any
laws and does not advise or recommend the non-filing of any return or
non-payment of any tax for which any person is legally liable. For legal
advice, consult your attorney.
[BOX]___________________________________________________________
Recently, the New York Times seems to have taken on the
role of cheerleader
for the IRS.
Their reporter, David Cay Johnston, spent days gathering
information about tax researchers' findings and
allegations, but his two
stories and The Times editorial on the subject reported
virtually nothing of
the researchers' findings.
Instead, employers who have stopped withholding, clearly
in accord with the
law, were labeled by The Times as "tax cheats"
and the researchers' findings
described as "bizarre," even though they are
well-documented and simply quote
the tax laws.
The Times did not present a single rebuttal to any of
our findings. The IRS did not specifically rebut any of the legal assertions .
The paper quotes IRS Deputy Commissioner Dale Hart as
saying that the
employers are scamming their workers, and that the IRS
will pursue the
workers unless they send in the taxes that should have
been withheld from
their paychecks.
This statement seems oddly conditional in light of our
research, which alleges that there is no obligation to
withhold in that
case, the pursuit and penalties shouldn't amount to much
- approximately
zero, according to the law.
Ms. Hart is quoted as saying that the employers' legal
rationale is
frivolous, has no legal authority, and has been
thoroughly rejected by the
courts. The
employers, of course, do not see their argument as frivolous,
and are unaware of any court case that has addressed or
rejected it.
The Times quotes Mr. Mark Matthews, chief of the IRS
Criminal Investigation
Division, as saying that some of the business owners
will be prosecuted for
tax evasion and other crimes. Since the Internal Revenue Manual says the
authorization of the CID is to enforce criminal statutes
applicable to U.S.
citizens residing in foreign countries and nonresident
aliens subject to the
federal income tax, it raises the question of just what
violations they'll be
trying to enforce.
We would like to take this opportunity to confirm our
invitation to Ms. Hart
and Mr. Matthews to attend our conference being held in
Arlington, VA on
Saturday, February 17, at the Hilton. They are free to comment upon our
allegations and to explain their positions to the group
assembled, OR to
attend long enough to at least tell us when the experts
at the IRS would be
available to meet with our tax researchers in a public
forum.
It is important to note that we have previously invited the
IRS and other
government officials to attend our last four conferences
held at the National
Press Club over the past 19 months, but none have given
us the courtesy of
even responding to our invitations.
SHOW
US THE LAW!
________________________________________________________________
YOU CAN HELP THE CAUSE! YOU CAN HELP MAKE PROJECT TOTO A
SUCCESS. TO FIND OUT HOW YOU CAN HELP GO TO OUR WEB SITE AT www.givemeliberty.org, or write to us at 2458
Ridge Rd., Queensbury, NY 12804, or fax us at (518) 656-9724 or call us at
(518) 656-3578. Our e-mail address is acta@capital.net.
For starters, order 500 copies of this ad from WTP for $50.